🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its decision was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action is part of a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican hold. Typically, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that might create several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party officials lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader said the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.